Prediction of Illya Marchenko [645th] vs Omni Kumar [544th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L W W L L
Form
L W W W W L W L L LH2H: Marchenko 2 - 0 Kumar
They have played 5 sets in total, with Marchenko winning 4 and Kumar winning 1. The last match between Marchenko and Kumar was at the Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem, 20-08-2023, Q3, Hard with Illya Marchenko getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Illya Marchenko | 2 |
| Omni Kumar | 0 |
| Marchenko | Stats | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (2-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 645 | Ranking | 544 |
| 49 | Highest Rank | 348 |
| 37 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 8 |
| 57% (604-458) | Career Total W/L | 63% (267-158) |
| $1,217,273 | Career Prize Money | $24,660 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Illya Marchenko
Player
Omni Kumar
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Omni Kumar
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 21 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:6:15 | Average Match Time | 2:6:15 |
| 51% (75/147) | 1st Serve % | 56% (76/135) |
| 71% (53/75) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (51/76) |
| 54% (39/72) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (26/59) |
| 73% (8/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (5/14) |
| 43% (58/135) | Return Points Win % | 37% (55/147) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Illya Marchenko vs Omni Kumar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Marchenko 2 - 0 Kumar
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marchenko has won 40% of points on their second serve, while Kumar has won 49.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marchenko, in recent form, has won 53.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kumar has won 45.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 20.67% and 33.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marchenko has saved 52.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kumar has saved 52.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marchenko has won 28.57% of matches played (W/L 6/ 15), with Kumar winning 62.22% (W/L 28/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 138), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 85). Kumar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 255/ 141), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 4/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.29% of matches (W/L 6/ 11), where as Kumar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 21/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Marchenko winning 2 times and Kumar being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Marchenko winning 4 and Kumar winning 1. The last match between Marchenko and Kumar was at the Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem, 20-08-2023, Q3, Hard with Illya Marchenko getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marchenko and Kumar have played a deciding set 1 times, with Marchenko winning 1 times and Kumar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marchenko winning 0, and Kumar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.67 while Kumar has played against players with an average rank of 222.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marchenko has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kumar has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marchenko has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kumar has converted 47.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Illya Marchenko vs Omni Kumar Best Odds For The Match
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Illya Marchenko
25%
(
2 of
8)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
7
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Illya Marchenko
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
6
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Joshua Charlton
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
94)
18
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
1
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
11
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Illya Marchenko
51%
(
60 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
14
Aces
11
14
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
46 of
56)
52%
(
30 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
93)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seongchan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Illya Marchenko
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Omni Kumar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Omni Kumar
59%
(
79 of
135)
1st Serve %
54%
(
72 of
133)
8
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
2
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
54%
(
30 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
57 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
55 of
133)
133
Total Points Won
135
|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Omni Kumar
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Omni Kumar
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Jacob Brumm
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
46%
(
36 of
78)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Omni Kumar
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Chris Rodesch
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
21
Total Points Won
15
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Nicolas Jadoun
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Fausto Tabacco
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Sebastian Prechtel
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Omni Kumar
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 7-6(5) 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Marchenko vs Kumar?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Marchenko Vs Kumar is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (604/458) | Win/Loss | 63% (267/158) |
| 56% (1422/1123) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (586/372) |
| 52% (12836/11887) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (4899/4064) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 4028 | Aces Total | 902 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2969 | Total Double Faults | 736 |
| 1:14:14 | Average Match Time | 1:27:18 |
| 159.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 229.49 |
| 57% (34438/59903) | 1st Serve % | 57% (12913/22794) |
| 72% (24897/34438) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (8797/12913) |
| 50% (12818/25456) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5061/9897) |
| 41% (2330/5660) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1096/2511) |
| 38% (23028/59962) | Return Points Win % | 42% (9587/22959) |
| 57% (570/1002) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (261/415) |
| 49% (23/47) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 50% (210/421) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (57/105) |
| 47% (172/369) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (55/109) |
| 83% (595/493) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (278/240) |
| 17% (595/102) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (278/38) |
| 24% (466/110) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (147/26) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
